性爱大师

《Toxic: A Fairy Tale for Grown-Ups》评测_我的网站

金牌调解

一 | Toxic: A Fairy Tale for Grown-Ups 将于 8 月 26 日上映。这是一部横跨五十年的黑帮动作传奇，Toxic: A Fairy Tale for Grown-Ups 时长 194 分钟，但观感却像是一部超长的预告片。 "What the revelations appear to show is that there was a close relationship between Joe Biden and his son, Hunter, and that there was likely high mutual awareness of one another’s business interests and, possibly, mutual support for some of these," said Joseph Oliver Boyd-Barrett, a professor emeritus at Bowling Green State University. "I don’t think the scandal has the power in itself of firing widespread outrage against Biden: there are just too many other things to be outraged about just now.",A review of Hunter Biden's personal calendar on the so-called "laptop from hell", which was abandoned by Hunter at a repair shop in Wilmington, Delaware, in April 2019, shows that the younger Biden and his business associate Eric Schwerin frequently met with then-US VP Joe Biden between 2008 and 2016. Hunter held at least 30 business meetings with his father either in the White House or the latter's vice-presidential residence, the Naval Observatory. Schwerin was reportedly invited to 21 out of the 30 confabs.,The New York Post found that all of the meets occurred days or even hours after Hunter's negotiations with high-profile foreign clients, prompting the media outlet to suggest that the younger Biden apparently discussed his business dealing with his father. The Post even goes so far as to not rule out that Hunter passed messages and requests from his clients to the then-vice president.,'Laptop From Hell': Hunter Biden's Calendar Suggests President Joe Was Well Aware of Business Trips17 July, 16:44 GMT,The latest revelation apparently has earmarks of an influence-peddling scheme, according to Charles Ortel, a Wall Street analyst and investigative journalist. What's more, Hunter's dealings with foreign tycoons and politicians have already been in the crosshairs of the US Department of Justice (DoJ) for quite a while.,"In theory, at least one US attorney has been investigating Hunter Biden and likely others for years, possibly in conjunction with a grand jury," said Ortel. "If this investigation is serious and objective, it must examine how Joe Biden and his family amassed so much wealth during decades of 'public service'.",However, "the practice of trading influence for off-market financial benefits is not confined to the Bidens or to Democrats alone," the analyst pointed out, asking rhetorically: "How did the Obamas, Bushes and Clintons become so wealthy?",At the same time, an in-depth investigation into the Bidens' shady conduct could also shed light on the unfolding Ukraine crisis, given Joe's role as Barack Obama's Ukraine appointee shortly after the 2014 coup d’état in Kiev, and Hunter's service at the Ukrainian energy firm Burisma at the time, according to Boyd-Barrett.,"It would be important, in a more rational polity – which of course this isn’t – to look very critically indeed at Joe Biden and Hunter Biden’s peculiar history with the 2014 coup and, subsequently, with Ukrainian energy interests, even marveling at the possibility that a private history with Ukrainian elites may have contributed to a fatally rash misreading of the events of February 24 and the lead-up to it," the professor said.,Talented Mr Biden: Hunter's Art Sales Reek of Pay-to-Play But DoJ Lost Sense of Smell, Analysts Say29 October 2021, 13:00 GMT,Laptop From Hell Exposure Comes Ahead of Midterms,The timing of the latest revelation comes as partisan strife for the control over the US Congress intensifies. The specter of the GOP jumping at the opportunity to use Joe's apparent involvement in his son's business activities to crush the Dems during the midterms and impeach the US president with a congressional majority has been raised.,While Republicans "may well, in effect, take control by next year," it is unclear whether they will double down on investigating the Bidens, especially given the mainstream press' reluctance to cover the issue, according to Boyd-Barrett.,The professor suggested that the GOP "could weigh the advantages earned them by the Durham investigation" instead. Special Counsel John Durham's indictments of former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann and ex-MI6 agent Chris Steele's source Igor Danchenko are very important for the Republicans as they help debunk the Russiagate hoax and mainstream media lies about Donald Trump's "collusion" with Russia, according to the academic.,Durham's Probe: Hillary Clinton Sowed Dragon's Teeth by Peddling Trump-Russia Hoax, Analyst Says5 October 2021, 16:30 GMT,Could Joe Biden be Impeached?,House GOP Conference Chair Elise Stefanik previously signaled that she would subpoena Hunter Biden if Republicans win back control of Congress in the 2022 midterm elections. She noted that the Post's latest exposure appears to be yet more evidence of corruption.,While potential House investigations into the Bidens may indeed take place and even turn into impeachment hearings if the lower chamber is controlled by the GOP, the fate of this effort seems unclear, according to Ortel.,"Conservative, non-RINO [Republicans in Name Only] candidates now appear poised to win a wave election in 2022," he projected. "Things may change, but no current projections show Republicans reaching 67 out of 100 seats in the US Senate which is the number of votes required to convict an impeached person.",What's more possible, according to the analyst, is that the Democrats, already damaged by Joe Biden's incompetent domestic and foreign policies, will turn on him and force him out.,"Influence-shapers are far to the left of Joe Biden and mounting evidence shows they are done protecting Biden and rightly so," Ortel said.,If Joe Biden steps down, it's unlikely that the Dems will agree to see Kamala Harris replacing him, the analyst continued.,"Behind the scenes, major Democrat donors are trying to decide whether they can convince Michelle Obama to jump in and also to convince the Clintons to remain home with all their political and personal baggage packed up for good," he said, projecting that a new centrist Democrat presidential candidate could potentially emerge in order to fill Joe's shoes.。虽然从技术上讲它是一个完整的故事——这在现代南印度大片领域中实属罕见，因为那里的每一部大作基本上都是“第一部分”——但本片的剪辑风格带有一种跳跃的印象主义色彩，当你试图理清人物关系，或者仅仅是想看清谁站在哪里时，这种风格会让人感到完全迷失。

二 | 诚然，出演过《KGF》系列的有胡须的一线明星 Yash（通常被称为“摇滚明星”Yash）的加盟，在很大程度上让这部电影在某些时刻变得可以忍受。这位演员在他饰演的双重角色中展现了多层次的魅力和爆发力：一个是冷酷无情的黑手党 Raya，另一个是最终被抛弃的儿子 Rumi（又名“Ticket”），后者为了报复被遗弃的命运而寻求复仇。然而，从视觉和叙事上理解 Toxic: A Fairy Tale for Grown-Ups 仍然是一个巨大的挑战。

三 | 从好的方面来看，鉴于其时代背景，Toxic: A Fairy Tale for Grown-Ups 具有视觉上的华丽感。

四 | 故事从 20 世纪 20 年代一直延续到 1947 年印度独立，甚至又向后推了几个十年，追踪了前葡萄牙港口果阿的变迁——这里被重新构想成了一个充斥着高级西装、软呢帽、汤姆逊冲锋枪和豪奢地下酒吧的毒品贸易天堂。

五 | 这是 20 世纪 20 年代芝加哥风格的印度西海岸，这种幻想式的包装使 Toxic: A Fairy Tale for Grown-Ups 成为印度历史上投资最高的电影之一（当然也是目前已上映电影中最贵的；其投资仅次于 S.S. Rajamouli 执导的《RRR》后续作品《Varanasi》，以及由 Yash 主演、将于 11 月上映的印度史诗巨作《罗摩衍那：第一部分》）。遗憾的是，所有这些努力似乎都浪费在了一部完全没有重点的电影上，它的灵魂存在于开场和结尾的几分钟里，但中间那三个小时却让人头痛不已。影片在马戏团的场景中拉开序幕，Toxic: A Fairy Tale for Grown-Ups 讲述了一个绰号为 Ticket 的小男孩（脸上画着悲伤小丑的妆容），被他疯狂的杂技演员母亲 Nadia（Kiara Advani 饰）交给了他充满仇恨的父亲 Raya（Yash 饰）——这是片中几个愤怒地狂饮烈酒的角色之一。这段充满焦虑的开场引发了观众的好奇心；显然，这些角色的过去发生了一些痛苦的事情，为爆发性的未来奠定了基础。

六 | 但很快，空白就被光速填补了。

七 | 追溯到几十年前，果阿毒品贸易的权力博弈涉及 Raya 未露面的父亲以及几名葡萄牙黑帮，每个人都有自己的家族纠葛。

八 | 最终，Raya 和他冷酷的姐姐 Ganga（Nayanthara 饰）通过一系列错综复杂的背叛，成为了主要的博弈者。电影很快进入了动作戏部分，其中充斥着大量的鲜血和暴力，以及人们预料中南印度“全印度”大片里那种大男子主义英雄式的摆拍，但事情很快就变糟了。

九 | 像许多面向多个市场的电影一样，Toxic: A Fairy Tale for Grown-Ups 同时用多种语言拍摄——在本例中是卡纳达语和英语。后者对于一个被宣传为暴力童话的故事来说显得辞藻华丽，但其诗意对话的尝试最终只是在解释故事背后的含义和潜台词，角色们的每一句台词听起来要么像俏皮话，要么像高调的宣言。

十 | 这产生了一种麻木的效果：一段时间后，没有任何对话能真正脱颖而出。同样让人感到麻木的是接二连三的动作戏。在大部分运行时间里，Toxic: A Fairy Tale for Grown-Ups 的故事是通过一个接一个的敌对派系向 Raya 的团队开火来讲述的，而他则克服重重困难取得胜利。

十一 | 但要理清谁是谁——或者为什么有人要做这些事——完全是徒劳的。你当然可以关掉大脑去观看这部像翻页书一样展开的电影，但观看 Toxic: A Fairy Tale for Grown-Ups 可能真的需要你时不时地闭上眼睛。剪辑次数之多，且没有清晰的焦点或地理位置感，起码让人感到晕头转向。观看 Toxic: A Fairy Tale for Grown-Ups 可能真的需要你时不时地闭上眼睛。遗憾的是，这部电影草率的剪辑并不局限于视觉构建。在音乐方面，它停留在 21 世纪初到中期，借鉴了那个时代国际大片和艺术电影宠儿的配乐——《花样年华》、《死亡幻觉》、《梦之安魂曲》，甚至是《黑暗骑士》——却缺乏原创性或连贯的声音特征。通常情况下，这一切的责任都会归咎于导演，但在这种情况下，很难想象 Toxic: A Fairy Tale for Grown-Ups——至少是现在电影院里的完成版——完全是电影人 Geetu Mohandas 的构思。她的上一部电影，马拉雅拉姆语黑帮电影《Moothon》，巧妙地伪装了一出沉浸在个人痛苦中的酷儿戏剧。但即使作为执导此类印度大片的少数女性之一，也很难不让人怀疑她的实际影响力（或缺乏影响力）。Toxic: A Fairy Tale for Grown-Ups 感觉像是制片厂制度向英雄崇拜和大男子主义陈词滥调低头的产物，尽管偶尔尝试颠覆这些预期，但大型动作场面完全依赖于厌女色彩的暴力。

十二 | 有时为了满足某种沙文主义的嗜血欲望，画面变得相当恶心。

十三 | Yash 饰演的 Raya 以风流韵事和性别歧视的嘲讽为特征，但 Mohandas 的镜头视角明显有别于印度大众媒体以男性为中心的视角。她在表现性爱和动作场面时，关注的是多毛的胸膛和卷起的袖子，而不是油光发亮的腹肌；她的女性角色也被赋予了比一般女主角更多的身体尊严。然而，在这样一个理清人物关系就像玩“打地鼠”游戏的故事中，这些最低限度的努力并没有起到太大作用。

十四 | 像 Nayanthara、Advani、Huma Qureshi、Tara Sutaria 和 Rukmini Vasanth 这样的女演员扮演的女性，其身份完全由她们与男性黑帮的亲疏关系决定——我可以把她们全部列出来，但要理清这部电影的人物关系图可能需要好几天的时间——她们最终都在冷峻的姿态和长达数分钟的尖叫之间摇摆，直到剧情变得过于刺耳而难以忍受。这种听觉上的不适感也同样适用于 Yash，他作为电影忧郁的主角及其报复心极强的儿子，占据了绝大部分的屏幕时间。虽然 Ticket 尽管时间线跳跃但只在最后一幕出现，但这却是 Yash 罕见地留着稀疏山羊胡而不是大胡子的角色，让他看起来几乎认不出来（再加上一些数字去老化技术）。但这足以从戏剧性上将 Ticket 与他的父亲区分开吗？答案比简单的“是”或“否”要复杂。

十五 | 两人都怀有同样的怒火，这是电影关于男性暴力在世代间循环的观点的一部分。Yash 和 Mohandas 共同努力，通过这些表演创造了一些特别的东西，即使由于杂乱无章的剪辑，我们只能窥见其中的光芒。作为 Raya，Yash 在其暴力、好色的外表下流露出一丝隐藏的自我厌恶；而作为 Ticket，他通过一个动作迅捷、如同梦魇般的跑酷动作塑造了独特的肢体感。

十六 | 在电影冰雪和阴雨的背景中，Ticket 是唯一让人感到超越了印度动作大片预期极限的人类元素。这可能是 Yash 迄今为止最出色的表演之一；不幸的是，它被困在了一部电影中，在这里暴力虽然服务于世代创伤的主题，但似乎也是随机爆发的——无论是针对我们从未见过的角色，还是由他们发起的，他们的动机和在故事中的位置起码让人摸不着头脑。最终，结果就是一个平庸的故事，偶尔伴随着刺耳的噪音爆发。